Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest Tech news from SynapseFlow

    What's Hot

    SpaceX Might Lose Almost No Time for Booster Shell, COPVs and Test Tank Loss

    November 22, 2025

    Shark PowerPro: a simple, great-value vacuum for most households

    November 22, 2025

    Top 5 Vertical Video Editors for Windows, Powered by AI

    November 22, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Homepage
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    synapseflow.co.uksynapseflow.co.uk
    • AI News & Updates
    • Cybersecurity
    • Future Tech
    • Reviews
    • Software & Apps
    • Tech Gadgets
    synapseflow.co.uksynapseflow.co.uk
    Home»Future Tech»SpaceX Might Lose Almost No Time for Booster Shell, COPVs and Test Tank Loss
    SpaceX Might Lose Almost No Time for Booster Shell, COPVs and Test Tank Loss
    Future Tech

    SpaceX Might Lose Almost No Time for Booster Shell, COPVs and Test Tank Loss

    The Tech GuyBy The Tech GuyNovember 22, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read0 Views
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    Advertisement


    The loss of Booster 18 during gas pressure testing only cost SpaceX the shell of a booster. There were no raptor engines in it.

    Advertisement

    UPDATE SpaceX says they will stack the Booster 19 Super Heavy Booster in December, 2025. They plan to keep the flight test for First Quarter 2026.

    The Starbase team plans to have the next Super Heavy booster stacked in December, which puts it on pace with the test schedule planned for the first Starship V3 vehicle and associated ground systems. Starship’s twelfth flight test remains targeted for the first quarter of 2026.

    — SpaceX (@SpaceX) November 22, 2025

    This was the loss of only the shell, COPVs and test tank. It was a routine gas-system pressure test. It was before structural proof testing. The LOX tank ruptured around 4:04 a.m. CT on November 21, crumpling and blowing out the lower section (aft/LOX tank area) while leaving the upper structure partially intact.

    Currently, the Booster is being held up by the new, larger Liquid Methane (LCH4) transfer tube, and it is unknown how SpaceX will safe this vehicle so that crews can return to Masseys. SpaceX either needs to find a way to collapse the booster safely and then clean up the scraps, or use the LR11000 crane at Masseys to stabilize it and scrap it.

    The two-three month delay adjustments to avoid delay means that 2026 Starship work can still focus on NASA HLS tests and refueling work needed and keep schedules. The start and ramp of Starlink version 3 launches will not slip if launch is still good in Q1 2026.

    Booster 19 hasn’t even started its stacking process in Mega Bay 1, and even if it were to start today, barring any investigation and modification time, the booster testing schedule might still be maintained.

    Another consequence of this failure is that SpaceX no longer has a booster to commission Pad 2. This is a big deal, as all the tank farm equipment must be tested during vehicle loading to verify that it works correctly. SpaceX could try to modify B18.1 to fit inside the launch mount for testing, or teams could try to salvage the aft section of Booster 18 and stick some small tanks on it. SpaceX plans to have a booster in a 2-3 weeks.

    If root cause ties to a V3-specific change then a minor redesign could add 1-3 months. So best case of no delay and worst case about 2 months. Three test launches at least would be needed to get to a certified V3 that is going to orbit and reusable.

    Each Super Heavy requires ~28-30 rings (4m-tall stainless steel cylinders, ~9m diameter, ~1-2 tons each). ~4 for the engine section (thrust puck), ~10-12 for the LOX tank (including domes), ~10 for the methane tank, and ~4-6 for the interstage/forward section.

    In 2025 SpaceX makes 300-360 rings/year (25-30/month) and this is up from ~150/month in 2024. This supports about 12 boosters/ship hulls annually, aligning with SpaceX’s 2026 goal of 25+ flights. SpaceX will increase 1000+ rings per year in 2027.

    IF Root Cause is a Quality Control vs. Redesign, and Impact on Booster 19 Design

    If the anomaly—a LOX tank rupture during gas pressurization—points to a quality control (QC) issue, not a fundamental design flaw requiring redesign.

    Speculated triggers include weld porosity, material defect in the tank wall, or improper gas sequencing (overpressurization from a valve fault), caught early in cryo/gas testing.

    SpaceX’s statement emphasizes data review for lessons learned on future prototypes, typical of iterative QC fixes (enhanced NDT scans or supplier audits).

    This may not impact Booster 19’s design. B19 shares the V3 architecture but is in parallel production. As a separate vehicle, it avoids B18’s specific hardware batch. QC mitigations (additional proof tests on B18’s sibling tanks B18.1/B18.3, already at 17 cryo cycles) can be applied inline without halting the line.

    Brian Wang is a Futurist Thought Leader and a popular Science blogger with 1 million readers per month. His blog Nextbigfuture.com is ranked #1 Science News Blog. It covers many disruptive technology and trends including Space, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Medicine, Anti-aging Biotechnology, and Nanotechnology.

    Known for identifying cutting edge technologies, he is currently a Co-Founder of a startup and fundraiser for high potential early-stage companies. He is the Head of Research for Allocations for deep technology investments and an Angel Investor at Space Angels.

    A frequent speaker at corporations, he has been a TEDx speaker, a Singularity University speaker and guest at numerous interviews for radio and podcasts.  He is open to public speaking and advising engagements.



    Advertisement
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Tech Guy
    • Website

    Related Posts

    NASA Awards Liquid Hydrogen Supply Contracts

    November 22, 2025

    Is the AI Bubble About to Burst? What to Watch for as the Markets Wobble

    November 22, 2025

    The Way Billionaires Are Using AI May Cause Concern They Have Actual Brain Damage

    November 22, 2025

    XAI Released Grok 4.1 Fast to Top Agentic Leaderboard, Grok 4.2 by Xmas, Grok 5 Q1 2026

    November 21, 2025

    Hubble Seeks Clusters in ‘Lost Galaxy’

    November 21, 2025

    Startup Zap Energy Just Set a Fusion Power Record With Its Latest Reactor

    November 21, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Advertisement
    Top Posts

    The iPad Air brand makes no sense – it needs a rethink

    October 12, 202516 Views

    Facebook updates its algorithm to give users more control over which videos they see

    October 8, 20257 Views

    Huawei Watch GT 6 Pro review

    October 12, 20256 Views
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Advertisement
    About Us
    About Us

    SynapseFlow brings you the latest updates in Technology, AI, and Gadgets from innovations and reviews to future trends. Stay smart, stay updated with the tech world every day!

    Our Picks

    SpaceX Might Lose Almost No Time for Booster Shell, COPVs and Test Tank Loss

    November 22, 2025

    Shark PowerPro: a simple, great-value vacuum for most households

    November 22, 2025

    Top 5 Vertical Video Editors for Windows, Powered by AI

    November 22, 2025
    categories
    • AI News & Updates
    • Cybersecurity
    • Future Tech
    • Reviews
    • Software & Apps
    • Tech Gadgets
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube Dribbble
    • Homepage
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    © 2025 SynapseFlow All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Ad Blocker Enabled!
    Ad Blocker Enabled!
    Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.